|
For Mondays reading, we
shift from Pynchons narrative of Oedipas journey to
two narratives of European arrival in North America. Before we
look at Cabeza de Vaca and Smith, I would like to outline a few
focus points for your reading of Greenblatts essay, "Culture."
"Culture"
While many cultural commentators
excoriate the language and rhetoric of literary criticism, I find
some of the most effective statements about the nature of literature,
the relationship between literature and culture, and the role
of literary analysis that I have ever read in this Greenblatt
essay. Please take the time to read it carefully. Come to class
with quotes and passages from the essay to discuss because we
will return to this essay again and again not only as we read
Smith and Cabeza de Vaca but also as we explore the many diverse
texts and contexts in American literature.
A few study questions to consider vis a vis Greenblatt (I do not
intend these questions to limit or define your thinking
just
prod it along a bit
always go where you interpretive impulses
take you
)
- What do you make of Greenblatts
location of culture in the interplay between restraint and
mobility? How do you see that applying to Bradstreet and
Pynchon? How about Smith and Cabeza de Vaca?
- How useful do you find the Greenblatt
heuristic (series of questions) that we should consider
as we read a literary work?
- We should consider and evaluate Greenblatts
assertions about the role of texts as reflections of and
shapers of culture and authors as "specialists in exchange."
The phrase "improvisatory intelligence" raises
interesting possibilities for how we read our authors, dont
ya think?
- I would like you to think carefully
about the connections between Greenblatts analysis
of The Tempest at the end of his essay and the Cabeza de
Vacca and Smith texts you are reading this weekend.
- Greenblatt raises questions about the
separation of literature and history into distinct academic
fields. Clearly, the texts we are reading this week further
muddy the waters. How would you apply Greenblatts
ideas about "symbolic economy" and the intersections
between history and literature to Smith and Cabeza de Vaca?
Cabeza de Vaca:
Your reading includes an excellent
brief intor that I will not attempt to improve. I will add, however,
my rationale for including this reading in our course. I think
it essential that we recognize that English was by no means the
first language of North America. Before the arrival of Europeans
we had hundreds of indigenous languages. Even among European arrivals,
Spanish narratives preceeded English accounts of what we now call
the United States. In this sense, multiculturalism and multilingualism
are not some PC notion from the 90s but the cultural reality
of America dating back to its pre-colonial history. Cabeza de
Vaca offers us a great test case for Greenblatts ideas.
How does he negotiate constraint and mobility? Lets also
not forget our disucssions about the nature of representation
and interpretation. Both Cabeza de Vaca and Smith must negotiate
with a culture they percieve as "other" than their own,
represent themselves and their culture to this "other"
group, and then represent this "other" back to their
homeland through narrative. Their accounts document their representations
of themselves and others and reflect their own interpretive contexts
and values. They also capture early efforts to shape a colonial
culture at once an extension of Europe but and a new variation
from it.
John Smith (1580-1631)
Ah yes, the Pocohantas story
Well, yes, but the far more interesting story we encounter, the
far more impressive voice we hear (however distorted by Smiths
voice and perspective) is Powhatans, the chief of the indigenous
tribes in the Jamestown area. Although it reads in the third person,
Smiths General History was written by Smith (he seems to
have written several versions) and first published in 1624. For
this reason, we should take his claims about "the presidents"
performance with a barrel or so of salt.
Jamestown, founded for commercial gain rather than religious idealism,
had a quite different feel to it than the later New England colonies.
For one thing, it was beset by internal leadership battles. Indeed,
we can read Smiths narrative as a defense of his own brief
but vital leadership period. Renowned for requiring all of the
settlers to work to help support the colony (an idea that did
not sit well with many of the noble born gold seeking colonists),
Smith enacted an aggressive approach to the Indians that eventually
put him at odds not only with his fellow colonists but also with
his employers back in England. He did, however, take seriously
native culture, even sending young men to live with the Indians
and learn their language. By 1609, Smith was on his way home after
a gunpowder explosion wounded him, but he never returned because
his employers had already decided to replace him.
As you read Smith, explore the
comparisons to and contrasts with Cabeza de Vaca while keeping
in mind the analytical approach Greenblatt outlines for us. Focus
in on Smiths representations of Powhatan and the Indians.
What do they tell us about the Indians and Smith?
|